Responsible Officer: Office of the Vice-Chancellor / Page Contact: Contact ANU PhD Programs in Research School of ManagementThe Research School of Management (RSM) has internationally recognised researchers who can supervise doctoral candidates on a diverse range of topics. To complete the PhD program, candidates who will do their research under the guidance of a supervisory panel, have to take four compulsory and two elective courses, be successful in the thesis proposal review process, and write a substantial thesis that is passed by external examiners. The Program Learning Outcomes for RSM’s PhD pertinent across its various disciplines are: Explain their philosophical approach and its incorporation into a significant research journey and the building of their doctoral identity. Problematise a complex social phenomenon within or across the domains of business and management studies that merits targeted study and research skills to advance scholarship and professional practice. Identify relevant databases to systematically retrieve applicable and appropriate literature to address research problems and ensuing questions. Critically and systematically review and discuss the extant body of complex knowledge within a domain to demonstrate the expertise and skills required for scholarly inquiry. Devise an effective research design, including a justification of the methodology(ies) developed, adapted and implemented for the scholarly study of the topic of interest. Actively prioritise the conduct of responsible and ethical research within an environment that promotes scholarship and collegiality Develop insights into the discipline through expert and specialised analytical, research and technical skills as applied to the research data collected. Determine the contributions and implications of the research for the advancement of theoretical knowledge and practice. Propose future directions of research in the discipline based on original insights and knowledge gained through a critical discussion of the findings of the research. Produce a manuscript in the form of a monograph or collection of scholarly articles to effectively communicate, disseminate and promote new insights within the academic community and society at large. RSM staff have diverse research interests and can provide supervision across a range of topics in disciplines such as: - Business Information Systems
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Entrepreneurship
- Human Resource Management
- International Business
- Organisational Behaviour
- Project Management
- Strategic Management
Read more about RSM research areas and researchers . CRICOS #: 048345A Duration: 2 to 4 years full time (4 to 8 years part time) Before you submit an application for entry to the program, you should: - ensure you meet the admission requirements outlined below
- identify potential supervisors – that is, one or two academics in RSM who conduct research in your area of interest.
You can find information on researchers and their research areas in the ANU researchers database and on the RSM research clusters page . You may contact the potential supervisor(s) directly and ask if they are available to work with you . You’ll need to list on your application form the name(s) of potential supervisors. Please note that applications will only be assessed when a supervisor is nominated and has agreed to supervise your proposed research. Potential supervisors cannot guarantee entry into RSM’s PhD program. Admission will depend on the strength of your application relative to others in the pool. After you’ve completed the steps above, you can proceed with an online application . Application deadlinesThe first semester of the ANU academic year starts in February, and the second semester starts in July. While all applications for first semester entry must be submitted before 31 October, international applicants wishing to be considered for an ANU scholarship should submit their applications before 31 August . To be considered for a scholarship, your application must be accompanied by all the supporting documents listed below, including the referee reports. Request for referee reports are triggered and sent to your nominated referees at the time of submission of program application. It is thus important that you submit your application in advance (2-3 weeks) to allow time for your referees to provide their reports prior to the scholarship deadline. If you’re currently completing an academic degree and haven’t yet received your final results and transcript, you should still submit all available documents before the deadline, and forward remaining results once you receive them. We won’t make a final decision on your application until we’ve received all the required documents. The admission requirements for a PhD program in RSM reflect the advanced knowledge that candidates will need to undertake the coursework component of the degree, and the research experience and skills needed to successfully undertake and complete the research thesis. The minimum qualification requirement for admission to the PhD program in RSM is: - an Australian Bachelor degree with at least Second Class Honours Division A (First Class Honours highly preferred) or its international equivalent, which should include a substantial thesis component in a relevant discipline – such as management, marketing, international business, business information systems or psychology – from an approved university, or
- a Master of Philosophy (or equivalent) degree with a significant research thesis component, from an approved university, or
- a coursework Master degree comprising a research thesis counting towards no less than 25 per cent of the degree, with the thesis grade and overall GPA (grade point average) both being at least a 6.0 (distinction) on a 7-point scale, from an approved university.
Admission to RSM’s PhD program is competitive and we can only admit a limited number of applicants each year. Meeting the minimum entry requirements does not guarantee you a place in the program. If you don’t satisfy the minimum entry standard for the School’s PhD program, you might consider applying to the MPhil program . If you’d like to consider this pathway, contact the RSM HDR (higher degree by research) convenor for more information. English language requirementsAll applicants must satisfy the University’s English language admission requirements . An international applicant who is not a native English speaker may satisfy these requirements by submitting evidence of an IELTS overall score of at least 6.5, and with no component less than 6.0, or a paper-based TOEFL score of at least 570, with at least 4.5 in the essay component. Application and supporting documentationYou must submit your application online via the ANU Application Manager . In addition to the standard information required in the online application, you must submit the following supporting documents as part of your application: - a completed RSM PhD/MPhil application questionnaire
- academic transcripts (scanned colour copies) and grading systems for all previously completed degrees
- a research proposal (a maximum of three pages, single-spaced, including a list of key references) that outlines your proposed area of research, the questions you plan to address, a research model and the major research methods you intend to use as part of your PhD thesis—see these guidelines on how to prepare a persuasive research proposal. Please note that if your research proposal exceeds three pages, you will be asked to revise it to meet the three-page requirement before your application can be assessed
- an email confirmation from the nominated supervisor as evidence of their consent to supervise
- an up-to-date CV or resume
- copies of research publications (if available), e.g. research articles that you’ve published in recognised international journals or have presented at respected international conferences
- official TOEFL or IELTS results (where applicable) to demonstrate that you satisfy the University’s English language requirements
- a one-page statement outlining your motivation to undertake a PhD in RSM, describing your strengths, weaknesses, career goals and anything else you feel is relevant
- nomination of three referees. A referee report form will automatically be sent to the referees you list in your online application. Your application will be complete and ready for assessment once we receive all documents, including referee reports
- GRE General Test or GMAT scores (if taken)
- additional relevant supporting documents (if available – five-page limit).
Offers of admissionThe HDR convenor will review all complete applications submitted by the relevant deadline. If your application is short-listed, you may be required to attend an interview (face to face or online). We may send you an offer of admission if you satisfy the eligibility criteria and your area of interest matches those of RSM academics with supervisory capacity. However, since admission is competitive and supervisory capacity is limited, we won’t send any offers of admission until after the relevant application deadline , irrespective of the date when you submit your application. The PhD program in RSM consists of two components – coursework and research . Candidates undertake the research component concurrently with the required coursework. PhD coursework componentIn the coursework component, PhD candidates learn the foundations of theories and research methods. PhD candidates should complete the following coursework requirements within the first 12 months of the commencement of their program as per ANU procedure – HDR – Candidature progression: https://policies.anu.edu.au/ppl/document/ANUP_012810 Both of the following courses - MGMT8006 Management Research Methods (Semester 1)
- MMIB8008 Theory in Management (Semester 1)
One of the following courses in consultation with the primary supervisor - SOCR8008 Qualitative Data Collection (Semester 1)
- SOCR8003 Qualitative Research Analysis (Semester 2)
- SOCR8001 Statistics for Social Scientists (Semester 1)
[ This course is for candidates without foundational knowledge in statistics ] - STAT7055 Introduction to Statistics for Business and Finance (Semester 1 or Semester 2)
- STAT7038 Regression Modelling (Semester 1 or Semester 2)
[ This course is for candidates with foundational knowledge in statistics ] Two of the following courses in consultation with the primary supervisor - MMIB8003 Special Research Topic 1 (Semester 1 or Semester 2)
- MMIB8004 Special Research Topic 2 (Semester 1 or Semester 2)
- SOCR8011 Mixed Methods Social Research (Winter term)
- SOCR8201 Introduction to Social Science Methods and Types of Data (Semester 1 or Spring Term)
- SOCR8203 Advanced Techniques in the Creation of Social Science Data (Winter term)
- Other courses approved by the primary supervisor and RSM HDR Program Convenor
PhD research componentIn the research component, candidates contribute to their field of specialisation by writing a thesis under the guidance of a panel of supervisors. The thesis must demonstrate the candidate’s ability to undertake independent research, and make a significant contribution to one of the disciplines of RSM, with the potential to be published in leading journals in relevant disciplines. The thesis is typically 200 to 250 pages, with a maximum limit of 400 pages or 100,000 words. The thesis will be independently assessed by three external expert examiners of international standing. Candidates are expected to consult with their supervisory panel, which can assist, advise, and provide support and encouragement for a timely and successful completion of the thesis. Research supervisory panelWhen a candidate is admitted to the program, a primary supervisor is appointed. The primary supervisor has the responsibility of overseeing the candidate’s progress until a supervisory panel is chosen. During the first year of the program, it is important that candidates start developing their research topic ideas by consulting with their primary supervisor and other academic staff at RSM. In this year, a supervisory panel will also be chosen (typically comprising three academics). Based on the primary supervisor’s nominations, the HDR convenor will determine the composition of the supervisory panel in consultation with the candidate. The primary supervisor will provide close supervision on the research. Other panel members will assist when needed. At the very least, the panel members are required to read the final drafts of the thesis proposal and the dissertation. The panel is also consulted during the annual review of the candidate’s progress. RSM seminar programRSM runs a weekly seminar program, featuring internationally renowned speakers presenting their work. To provide learning and networking opportunities that assist in the development of research skills, all research candidates are required to attend and actively participate in the seminar series. Research integrity trainingWithin three to six months of enrolment, all PhD candidates must complete the Research Integrity Training and pass the exam. Completion of this course and exam is a compulsory milestone for all PhD candidates. Thesis proposal reviewPhD candidates must develop their thesis proposal in the first year of their candidature, and submit it to their supervisory panel for review by the second year of study. The purpose of the thesis proposal review is to assess the originality, significance, adequacy and achievability of the candidate’s thesis plan. The candidate generally submits their thesis proposal in conjunction with their seminar presentation. The proposal includes a description of the research to be undertaken in the thesis, along with a summary of the thesis structure and time plan. Successful completion of the review is required to continue in the program. Annual progress reviewIt is University policy that each candidate’s progress be reviewed periodically. In each year of their program, PhD candidates are required to submit an annual plan and report as a basis for periodic progress review. This document provides details on work completed by the candidate since the previous review, current progress, and any problems that may impact their research. It also outlines the coursework and research the candidate intends to undertake in the following 12 months. During their program, PhD candidates are expected to present their research yearly (when studying full-time) at opportunities provided by RSM, such as seminars, conferences and doctoral colloquiums. Oral presentationIn their final year, candidates are required to give a final oral presentation on their research, usually three months before submitting their thesis. Read more about research candidate milestones . Thesis submission and examinationThe culmination of a PhD program in RSM is a written thesis which, upon completion, is submitted for examination. The thesis is examined by experts in the relevant field. For more information on the process, visit our page on submitting a thesis . For information about scholarships available to HDR candidates, visit our page on scholarships and fees . Read details of some of our alumni’s recent job placements . A list of current PhD candidates in the School is available on the RSM staff directory . Current Students ANU College of Health & Medicine ANU College of ScienceApplication to submit phd thesis by compilation, degree level. CHM/COS Requirements for a Thesis by Compilation A 'Thesis by Compilation' allows a candidate to submit his / her thesis for examination by published work. The number of publications is not prescriptive due to disciplinary variability, however should include at least three publications of which the majority are first author. All candidates are automatically set up to submit their thesis as a standard thesis. If you wish to submit your thesis as a 'Thesis by Compilation' you must submit an MMD-HDR "Change Working Thesis Details" eForm at least 12 months, and no later than 6 months before completing the 'Notification of Intent to Submit' (NOI) milestone eForm. This process requires approval from your Primary Supervisor and Delegated Authority. It is important to speak with your Primary Supervisor, Delegated Authority or HDR Administrator before requesting a change to your thesis format. Please see: " Change Working Thesis Details " webpage for more information on format types and procedure. The University procedure ( ANU HDR - Thesis by Compilation and Thesis by Creative Works procedure ) also requires a detailed ‘statement of contribution’ to be included and bound into the thesis at the time of submission. This statement must detail the contribution to each paper, and include an agreement to the contribution statement and the inclusion of the paper by co-authors, using the ' Thesis by Compilation_Statement of Contribution ' template attached. To ensure this requirement is followed, the statement must be endorsed by the supervisor and the Delegated Authority before submission of the thesis. At least two months prior to submission, and after consulting with your supervisory panel, a candidate should commence the 'Notification of Intent to Submit (NoI)' milestone eForm (available via ISIS) indicating the thesis title, abstract, intended date of submission and thesis format. NB: You CANNOT change these details following submission so please ensure they are correct prior to submission of thesis for examination. [SEE: Thesis by Compilation Application & Thesis by Compilation_Statement of Contribution forms] - New bachelor students
- New masters students
- Requesting permission to enrol
- Structuring your degree
- Forms, protocols & processes
- Bachelor degree courses
- Honours pathway
- Master degree courses
- Other courses
- First year course guide
- Direct entry Honours programs
- Admission to honours
- Scienceshop
- Field Trips
- Science coursework internship program
- Science, Health & Medicine HDR Internships
- Available placements
- Past placements
- COS Student ambassador
- CHM Student ambassador
- Career development
- Other opportunities
- Bachelor & Honours research
- Postgraduate research
- Scholarships
- Finding a supervisor
- College research links
- Student Services
- Student appointments
- Accessibility contacts
- Feedback & grievances
Research School of Social Sciences- Schools & Centres
- Study with us
Related Sites - ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences
- Research School of Humanities & the Arts
- Australian National Internships Program
Administration You are hereCall for PhD Applicants: Language Model Agents and Society working with Professor Seth LazarThe Machine Intelligence and Normative Theory (MINT) Lab at the ANU is seeking highly motivated PhD candidates to work under the supervision of Professor Seth Lazar on its new project on Language Model Agents and Society, on funded scholarships totalling $50,000AUD per year in 2025, 2026 and 2027. This ambitious research project aims to explore the societal impacts, ethical considerations, and regulatory frameworks surrounding the development and deployment of Language Model Agents—advanced AI systems powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), that are capable of autonomous action, decision-making, and tool usage. Terms, application details, and more information is in the document below. File attachments- Call_for_PhD_Applications_LMAS_v5_1.pdf ( PDF , 208.17 KB )
Tweets by @ANUcassThere were no tweets found. Connect with usUpdated: 20 August 2024 / Responsible Officer: RSSS Director / Page Contact: CASS Marketing & Communications - Contact ANU
- Freedom of Information
+61 2 6125 5111 The Australian National University, Canberra TEQSA Provider ID: PRV12002 (Australian University) CRICOS Provider : 00120C ABN : 52 234 063 906 Research School of Chemistry ANU College of ScienceProf. adam perriman. Content navigationAdam Perriman is a Professor of Bioengineering and was recently appointed at the Australian National University (RSC and JCSMR) and holds a joint appointment with the School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol (UK). He is also Director of the Bristol Centre for Bioprinting. He is internationally distinguished for his pioneering research on the construction and study of novel synthetic biomolecular systems, and his research interests span the fields of chemistry, synthetic biology and tissue engineering. His contributions to this field of interdisciplinary science led to him being named a Wellcome Trust Frontiers Innovator in 2015, and in 2016, he was awarded the British Biophysical Society Young Investigator's Award and Medal. In 2019, he was named a UK Research and Innovation Future Leaders Fellow. In 2017 he founded the cell therapy spinout biotech company CytoSeek , which has raised in excess of $10M (CytoSeek: https://www.cytoseek.uk/). His research into the development of novel biomaterials has generated extensive media coverage and has been featured nationally in Royal Society of Chemistry’s Chemistry World , The Chemical Engineer , New Scientist , and internationally in Nature , Nature Chemistry and Chemical and Engineering News ( C&EN ). This research also led to nationally-broadcast interviews on BBC4. The Perriman Group at the ANU comprises four postdoctoral researchers and Prof Perriman, are we are looking for enthusiastic and talented honours and PhD students. Affiliations- Perriman Research Group
- Chemical Biology (RSC)
- Division Genome Science and Cancer (JCSMR)
- School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (UoBristol, UK)
2019 UK Research and Innovation Future Leader Fellowship. 2019 Launch Great Western Rising Star Award. 2017 SynbiCITE 4 Day MBA Best Synthetic Biology Start-Up, 2017. 2016 British Biophysical Society Young Investigator's Award and Medal. 2015 Named a Wellcome Trust's Frontiers Innovator. 2013 Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Early Career fellowship. 2010 Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Postdoctoral fellowship supported by Cross-Disciplinary Interfaces Programme . - Chemical Biology , Member
Research interestsThe Perriman Research Group is an interdisciplinary research initiative with a strong focus on the development of novel bionanomaterials and engineered living materials (ELMs) for use in regenerative and synthetic biology with transcendental applications. PublicationsGoogle Scholar - Bachelor of Science
- Bachelor of Philosophy (Honours)
- Bachelor of Science (Advanced) (Honours)
- Honours in Chemistry
- Master of Science in Materials Science
- PhD & MPhil
- Bridging course
- Chemistry Ambassador program
- Majors, minors & specialisations
- Student profiles
- Research areas
- Research groups
- Research projects
- Research facilities
- Research stories
- Battery lab
- Compounds ANU
- Professional staff
- Emeritus and Honorary
- Past events
- Event series
- Chemistry Future Fund
- Environmental Sustainability Research Grants
- Australian Drug Observatory
- How to give
- Inclusion, diversity, equity and access
- The Arthur Birch lecture
- David Craig visiting professorship
- Rita Cornforth Fellowship
- Future students enquiries
- General enquiries
- Current students enquiries
- Current students
- HDR students
Jury fails to reach verdict in trial of former ANU PhD student accused of raping a woman during secluded picnicBy Elizabeth Byrne By Rosie King Topic: Courts and Trials The jury had been deliberating since Friday but said it was unable to reach a unanimous verdict. ( ABC News: Matt Roberts ) The jury in the trial of a former PhD student from the Australian National University accused of raping a woman twice while on a picnic for his birthday has failed to reach a verdict after nearly four days of deliberations. The 38-year-old man was charged with two counts of sexual assault after a picnic with the alleged victim at a secluded spot at the Cotter Reserve just outside Canberra in 2020. What's next?The case will go before a registrar later this month. It's not yet clear whether there will be a retrial. Warning: This story contains graphic details of an alleged sexual assault. During the two-week trial, the ACT Supreme Court heard that on the day of the alleged rape, the pair had a picnic in the car, drank wine from a bottle and put towels on the windows for privacy. They both gave graphic accounts of what was alleged to have happened next. The man said he gagged the woman and tied her hands, telling the court she said "yes" when he asked if she was ready. But the woman said she told him she did not feel comfortable and tried to mouth the word "no". The man rejected her account, saying he "checked in" with her to make sure she was OK, adding that she replied by saying "yes, daddy", and telling him she loved him. Prosecutor Trent Hickey challenged the man's version of events. "You know she is traumatised from what you did?" Mr Hickey asked. "I do not accept she is traumatised from anything I've done," the man responded. Woman allegedly 'love-bombed' by accusedA key issue in the case was the status of their relationship. The court heard the pair had exchanged thousands of messages — many sexual in tone — in the lead-up to the alleged incident. The woman admitted she had fallen for the man after he "love-bombed" her. "You fell head over heels for him?" the man's lawyer, Andrew Tiedt, asked. "Yes, at the start," she replied. The woman maintained she believed the man had been her boyfriend but the man told the jury he was polyamorous and did not regard her as his girlfriend. The woman also recounted the man's reaction after she told him she was in pain following the alleged rape. She said he told her she was overreacting and threatened to shoot or stab her, her parents and her dog if she became a liability. The man said later when the pair drove to another park, the woman gave him a birthday card asking him to leave his wife, which he refused to do. The woman said she went home and scrubbed herself in the shower for hours, which was backed up by a family member. A text message the woman sent the man later that night was a pivotal issue in the case. "Good night my Texas Daddy, I am in a bit of pain but I think it will settle, I hope you had a beautiful birthday, I love you," it read. Mr Tiedt challenged the woman, saying she was keen to have sex with him again. The woman described that as "bullshit". She told the court she sent the message because she was scared and keen to placate him. Second woman gives evidenceIn an unusual move, the prosecution was allowed to call for evidence from a second woman who alleged she had been raped by the same man, though he was not charged over the matter. A police officer gave evidence to say the two women did not know each other. The court heard the second woman had told the man she did not want to have sex with him but he had done it anyway and said immediately afterwards that "that can never happen again". The pair had been friends but after the incident, they stopped their frequent messaging. The man said it was because of a falling-out over an argument. But Mr Hickey reminded the jury there were messages between the two later when the woman said "you did the wrong thing" and he replied, "yeah, I know". Mr Hickey also challenged the man over his detailed memory of both events and asked how he could remember so much detail so many years later. "It was quite a lot of fun," he said. The jury had been deliberating since Friday but this afternoon told Chief Justice Lucy McCallum it was unable to reach a unanimous verdict and was discharged. "A person should not be acquitted or found guilty unless 12 people agree," Chief Justice McCallum said. "It's clear that you have done your best and it doesn't mean that you have failed. "It means the system has succeeded." The case will go before a registrar later this month. It is not yet clear whether there will be a retrial. The Australian Olympian 'Raygun' went viral for her breaking moves. Now she's defending them.- Rachael Gunn, known as "Raygun," is an Australian B-girl (break-girl) who competed at the Olympics .
- She lost three battles in the round-robin part of the competition, but her moves went viral online.
- Gunn and sporting organizations are speaking out about harassment and misinformation after her performance.
Breaking made its debut at the 2024 Paris Olympics — and while she didn't earn a spot on the podium, the Australian breaker Rachael Gunn, known as Raygun, has received plenty of recognition online. Gunn is a 36-year-old lecturer at Macquarie University in Sydney whose research focuses on the "cultural politics of breaking," according to her faculty profile . But Gunn's time on the Olympic stage was short-lived. The B-girl was eliminated during the round-robin stage of the women's breaking competition, losing in one-on-one battles to the United States' Logistx, France's Syssy, and Lithuania's Nicka. Raygun didn't earn a point in any of those battles, but as clips of her performance spread online, she got something else: instant meme status. Here's what you need to know about Raygun now that the breaking competition is over. Raygun is an academic who studies breaking — and she competes internationallyBefore Gunn went to the Olympics, she approached the 2024 Games from an academic perspective. With her coauthor, Lucas Marie, Gunn published an article in the June 2023 issue of Global Hip Hop Studies titled "The Australian breaking scene and the Olympic Games: The possibilities and politics of sportification." The article examined how the Olympics' institutionalization would affect the Australian breaking scene. Alongside her academic career, Gunn is a competing B-girl. But before she got into breaking, she had experience with ballroom dancing, jazz, hip-hop, salsa, and tap, The Australian Women's Weekly reported. Gunn told The Sydney Morning Herald that her husband, Samuel Free, introduced her to breaking in 2008 while they were at university. Free is still her coach, she said. Gunn told Women's Weekly that breaking "hooked" her in 2012, around the time that she began her doctoral program in cultural studies. She began competing more seriously in 2018 and eventually set her sights on the Olympics. According to her university profile, she was the top-ranked B-girl of the Australian Breaking Association in 2020 and 2021, representing the country at the World DanceSport Federation Breaking Championships in 2021, 2022, and 2023. She also won the WDSF Oceania Breaking Championships in 2023. "My bag always has two main things: It's like, my knee pads and my laptop," Gunn said on the podcast " The Female Athlete Project ." "Because I need my knee-pads to break. And then, yeah, just do some emails quickly. Or like, do some revisions on a chapter I submitted, or copyedit this article I did, or moderate those grades." The athlete also told the Herald that she preferred to wear "baggy jeans and a baggy T-shirt" while breaking. "I like the heaviness they bring," Gunn said. "Maybe it's my background in hip-hop, but having weight closer to the ground works for me, gets me in the right headspace." Raygun's performances at the Olympics sparked memes and criticismRaygun took the stage at the Olympics wearing a tracksuit in Australia's green and gold, breaking out moves that included hopping like a kangaroo. Her performances attracted attention online and memes that compared her moves to, among other things, dancing children. Related stories The fact that RayGun has a Ph.D in breakdancing is its own commentary on academia vs real world expertise. https://t.co/pQcL8HzAW9 — BioTechSnack (@SnackBioTech) August 9, 2024 me forcing my mom to watch the dance i made up in the pool pic.twitter.com/zbtwEFjpTG — kenzi (@kenzianidiot) August 9, 2024 Judges made the right call here because what was that move lol #Olympics #Breakdancing pic.twitter.com/sXAs9AdHjX — MⓞNK BLOODY P👑s (@MonkeyBlood) August 9, 2024 But some critics argued that Raygun's performance didn't represent breaking — a sport that will not return to the 2028 Games in Los Angeles. Breaking came from Black and brown communities in the Bronx in the 1970s. Malik Dixon, an African American man who lives in Australia, told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that Gunn came off as "somebody who was toying with the culture" during a significant moment for the sport. (You can watch the 2024 Olympic events — including Raygun's full performance — on Peacock.) Raygun qualified for the Olympics through the Oceania Breaking ChampionshipsThere were three ways to qualify for breaking at the Olympics, which the World Dance Sport Federation (WDSF) outlined in April 2022: at the WDSF championship in Belgium in September 2023, in a continental qualifier, or in an Olympic qualifier series held in 2024. Gunn qualified regionally by winning the WDSF Oceania Breaking Championships, which were held in Sydney in October 2023. AUSBreaking organized the Oceania Breaking Championships, according to the WDSF . AUSBreaking posted on Instagram about the Oceanic Olympic qualifying event on Instagram in September 2023, announcing in a September 25, 2023 post that competitor registration was open. The panel of judges was composed of 10 breakers from multiple countries, led by head judge Katsu One of Japan. Per the Sydney Morning Herald, Gunn was the highest-scoring B-girl on day one of the championships. She won two battles on the second day to secure her title and a qualifying spot in the 2024 Olympic Games in Paris. AUSBreaking released a statement on Instagram Monday about the selection process, saying that the qualifying event was "open to all interested participants in the Oceanic region," conducted in line with WDSF standards, and adjudicated by an international panel that used the same judging system as the 2024 Olympics. "Ultimately, Rachael Gunn and Jeff Dunne emerged as the top performers in exactly the same process, securing their spots to represent Australia in Paris," the statement reads. "Their selection was based solely on their performance in their battles on that day." Raygun and sporting organizations have spoken out about misinformation after her performanceClaims have circulated online that Gunn unfairly obtained her spot in the games. Posts online, as reported by the Australian Associated Press , claimed that Gunn's husband was one of the judges in her qualifying event. One petition hosted on Change.org claimed that she established the governing body that ran the selection process. That petition was eventually removed after it was placed under review, per an archived snapshot . A representative for Change.org confirmed to Business Insider on Thursday that the petition had been flagged for misinformation, reviewed per the platform's community guidelines, and removed from the platform. "Change.org maintains strict guidelines against content that constitutes harassment, bullying, or spreading false information. We take such matters seriously and remove any content that violates these standards to protect our users and uphold the integrity of our community," the rep said in an email statement to BI. Despite the online claims, Free was not one of the judges at Gunn's qualifying event. And Gunn did not establish AUSBreaking. The organization said in a statement that it was founded by its president Lowe Napalan in 2019, and "at no point" was Gunn "the founder, an executive, committee member, or in any position of leadership." The Australian Olympic Commission (AOC) also released a statement condemning the Change.org petition, and demanding its removal. It also said that by winning the Oceania championship, Gunn was "legitimately nominated" by DanceSport Australia to the AOC to represent Australia at the Olympics. "The petition has stirred up public hatred without any factual basis. It's appalling," AOC chief executive officer Matt Carroll said in the statement. "No athlete who has represented their country at the Olympic Games should be treated in this way and we are supporting Dr. Gunn and Anna Meares at this time." In a video uploaded to her personal Instagram account, Gunn said that she was "honored" to have represented Australia and breaking during its Olympic debut. But the "hate" that followed was "devastating," she said. When it came to misinformation around her qualification, Gunn referred viewers to previously issued statements from the AOC and AUSBreaking. Raygun and breaking judges have defended her Olympic performanceAt a press conference on Saturday, the day after Gunn's competition, Anna Meares, the head of the Australian team, responded to criticism of Gunn online. "I love Rachael, and I think that what has occurred on social media with trolls and keyboard warriors, and taking those comments and giving them airtime, has been really disappointing," Meares said, per ESPN . "Raygun is an absolutely loved member of this Olympic team. She has represented the Olympic team, the Olympic spirit with great enthusiasm. And I absolutely love her courage," Meares continued. "I love her character, and I feel very disappointed for her, that she has come under the attack that she has." During a press conference on Sunday, Martin Gilian, the Olympic breaking head judge, defended Gunn's performance, saying breaking was "all about originality" and representing your roots, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported. "This is exactly what Raygun was doing," Gilian said. "She got inspired by her surroundings, which in this case, for example, was a kangaroo." Gunn said during the Saturday press conference that "all of my moves are original," ESPN reported. She told The Guardian that her biggest strength was "creativity." "I was never going to beat these girls on what they do best, the dynamic and the power moves, so I wanted to move differently, be artistic and creative," Gunn told The Guardian, "because how many chances do you get that in a lifetime to do that on an international stage. I was always the underdog and wanted to make my mark in a different way." This story was originally published on August 12, 2024, and has been updated to include the latest information and statements from those involved. |
IMAGES
COMMENTS
At ANU there are rules and guidelines that govern your responsibilities and requirements as a student. Some of these are specific to higher degree research (HDR) candidates, while others apply to ANU students and staff more broadly.The most important of the HDR policy documents is the Research Awards Rule; the federal legislation which underpins the ANU HDR policy framework of policies ...
Research Awards Rules for the purposes of that candidate. 3.If at any stage of the submission or examination process an allegation of academic misconduct is raised it is investigated under the Academic Integrity Rule 2021. Advice is available from [email protected]. Pre-Submission of Thesis Oral Presentation
The rules, policies, procedures and guidelines most relevant to ANU Higher Degree Research (HDR) supervision are listed and linked in the table below. Visit the HDR policies & procedures webpage for an overview of the HDR policy framework from a candidate's perspective. ANU HDR supervision policies HDR supervision HDR candidature HDR administration HDR funding Rules Research Awards Rule 2021 ...
A combination of qualifications, research publications and/or professional experience related to your field of study. Requirements for admission to a Master of Philosophy degree. An Australian bachelor's degree or higher, with an overall grade of distinction or higher, or the international equivalent, or. Another equivalent degree, or.
The major component of a research program is a substantial written work known as a thesis, which investigates a particular subject or issue. As a research student, you will work with increased independence, under the direction of an academic supervisor or a supervisory panel of academic staff. A PhD will normally take you between 2-4 years to ...
Information. This document provides support to the Higher Degree by Research: Supervision Policy and outlines typical processes undertaken during HDR candidature. Information generated and received by ANU staff in the course of conducting business on behalf of ANU is a record and should be captured by an authorised recordkeeping system.
The papers must have been researched and written during the course of the candidature, except in the case of candidates admitted to a PhD program as a staff member under the Research Awards Rule. The scope and quality of a thesis by compilation is commensurate with the contribution to knowledge expected of a candidate for the relevant degree.
The Australian National University provides PhD candidates with a vibrant research community and outstanding program support. When selecting a research program, an institution's reputation is everything. ANU is one of the world's leading universities, and the smart choice for your research program. As a PhD candidate you will work with increased independence, under the direction of a ...
The PhD degree requires submission of a thesis of not more than 100,000 words that makes a substantial contribution to learning in the field of law. ... at ANU must fulfil the minimum residency requirements specified in the Australian Government's Research Award Rules 2017 unless approval has been obtained for a reduced period of attendance ...
Supervisory panel membership (PhD only) PhD students are supervised by a supervisory panel, rather than one single supervisor. The University has a Supervision in Higher Degrees by Research Code of Practice which you should read, along with the Guidelines for Supervision and Candidature of Doctoral Research Students. A Chair of the Panel is ...
The PhD program in Economics is offered by the Research School of Economics (RSE), and caters to candidates of the highest academic ambition. RSE offers a diverse and stimulating intellectual environment, attracting candidates as well as faculty from all over the world. The School values open academic discourse, encourages collaboration, and is ...
The Australian National University provides PhD students with a vibrant research community and outstanding program support. When selecting a research program, an institution's reputation is everything. ANU is one of the world's leading universities, and the smart choice for your research program. As a PhD student you will work with increased independence, under the direction of a supervisory ...
The University rules governing graduate research at ANU can be found at Graduate Research Award Rules. What are the tuition fees for HDR students? Domestic students (Australian citizens, Australian permanent residents and New Zealand citizens) are not required to pay tuition fees for graduate research study as they are covered by the Australian ...
There are three common types of thesis documents allowed in the ANU research award rules: a standard thesis of up to 100,000 words in length for a PhD (or 60,000 words for an M.Phil); a thesis by compilation (sometimes called a thesis by publication) and a thesis by creative works. A thesis by compilation may include works that are solo or ...
Starting a research degree can be a confusing time, especially if you are new to ANU. This checklist is designed to help you navigate the first six months of your research degree.Before you arriveSign up for the next week-long induction event for new HDR candidates run by ANU Researcher Development. All new HDR candidates are expected to attend ...
A candidate not approved to study outside the University normally must attend the ANU campus for a minimum of: For a PhD: For 72 units (1.5 years as a full-time candidate and 3 years as a part-time candidate); or; For an MPhil: For 48 units (1 year as a full-time candidate or 2 years as a part-time candidate).
The Program Learning Outcomes for RSM's PhD pertinent across its various disciplines are: Explain their philosophical approach and its incorporation into a significant research journey and the building of their doctoral identity. Problematise a complex social phenomenon within or across the domains of business and management studies that ...
All candidates are automatically set up to submit their thesis as a standard thesis. If you wish to submit your thesis as a 'Thesis by Compilation' you must submit an MMD-HDR "Change Working Thesis Details" eForm at least 12 months, and no later than 6 months before completing the 'Notification of Intent to Submit' (NOI) milestone eForm.
We would like to show you a description here but the site won't allow us.
The integrated Ph.D. programme shall lead to the award of two degrees - a Masters by Research degree and a Ph.D. degree. The required dissertation work for the Masters by Research degree may be completed over the Summer or Winter School term with the permission of the Research Supervisor and the Executive Committee.2.
The Machine Intelligence and Normative Theory (MINT) Lab at the ANU is seeking highly motivated PhD candidates to work under the supervision of Professor Seth Lazar on its new project on Language Model Agents and Society, on funded scholarships totalling $50,000AUD per year in 2025, 2026 and 2027.
The Perriman Group at the ANU comprises four postdoctoral researchers and Prof Perriman, are we are looking for enthusiastic and talented honours and PhD students. Affiliations Perriman Research Group Chemical Biology (RSC) Division Genome Science and Cancer (JCSMR) School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (UoBristol, UK) CytoSeek Awards 2019 ...
The jury in the trial of a former PhD student from the Australian National University accused of raping a woman twice while on a picnic for his birthday has failed to reach a verdict after nearly ...
The ANU Indonesia Project is a leading international centre of research and graduate training on the economy and society of Indonesia. Since its inception in 1965 by H.W. Arndt, the ANU Indonesia Project has been at the forefront of Indonesian studies in Australia and internationally. The ANU Indonesia Project is part of The Australian
Rachael Gunn, known as "Raygun," is an Australian B-girl (break-girl) who competed at the Olympics. She lost three battles in the round-robin part of the competition, but her moves went viral ...