International law has emerged from an effort to deal with conflict among states, since rules provide order and help to mitigate destructive conflict. It is developed in a number of ways. First, law often comes out of international agreements and treaties between states. Treaties are the most important source of international law and also serve as the origins of IGOs, which in turn are important sources of law. Second, customary practices that have evolved over time often become codified in law. Third, general legal principles that are common to a significant number of states can become part of the corpus of international law. Finally, law arises from the community of international legal scholars. Particularly on more technical issues, their expertise is often accepted by political leaders.
The existence of law, however, does not mean that conflict is any easier to resolve.[1] Instead, as law becomes more elaborate and constraining, it becomes increasingly contentious. The powerful do not wish to be constrained in their ability to respond to threats. At the same time, developing countries see much of international law as being crafted largely without their input, primarily due to the so-called democratic deficit in intergovernmental organizations ( IGOs ), which now are typically the negotiating venues for the creation of new law.
In this essay, we discuss the origins of international law, and analyze how international law has evolved in the twentieth century, focusing on the individualization of international law. Finally, we examine some of the contemporary criticisms of international law.
Perhaps the first question to ask is whether in fact international law is law at all. The primary distinction between domestic and international law is that the latter often lacks an enforcement mechanism. There is no government to enforce the law, as there is in domestic situations. International law is often as much a source of conflict as it is a solution to them. Most forms of international law are contested. Rarely is it agreed upon universally. As will be seen below, it is not enforceable unless powerful countries see it in their interest to do so. What is more, cross-cultural differences make its interpretation and implementation difficult. Another question is whether international laws can be considered law if they are not translated into domestic laws where there is greater potential for enforcement. By adapting international law into domestic statutes, governments theoretically provide enforcement mechanisms . There are also instances in which domestic law not only does not contain international law, but is in fact in contradiction to it.
Despite all of this, international law is often followed. This can be attributed in part to Great Power backing, but also much of international law is based on customary practice. International law may be enforced by states taking unilateral action if it is in their interest or through multilateral measures where sufficient consensus exists. Reciprocity can play a role, as benefits in other areas may be gained from following laws. In addition to ad hoc efforts to enforce international laws, a number of formal courts have been established for that purpose.
Historical origins.
It can be argued that international law began in 1648 with the Peace of Westphalia, which asserted the sovereign equality of states. Rules concerning the conduct of war ( jus ad bellum and jus in bello ) soon emerged, most famously codified in the Geneva Conventions of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Organizations soon emerged to facilitate the creation of law and to mediate disputes. The League of Nations sought unsuccessfully to effectively outlaw war. Recently, the clearest source of international law has been the United Nations. The U.N. Charter defines the conditions for the legal use of force, and the U.N. has served as the principal negotiating venue for the creation of new international law. The most recent development has been international law targeting individuals rather than states, as is evidenced by the creation of the International Criminal Court. These issues will be taken up after a review of state-oriented courts.
States have created an evolving collection of international institutions to facilitate the creation and maintenance of international law. The Hague Conference of 1899 established the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which was an institution to which states could come for dispute settlement. It was a forerunner to the Permanent Court of International Justice, created in the aftermath of World War I in 1921. It derived largely from the Treaty of Versailles, and laid the groundwork for the protection of minority rights . The Permanent Court of International Justice was reconstituted in 1946 as the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which is still in existence.
The ICJ was created as a judicial body to hear cases involving disputes between nation-states. It is made up of 15 judges, elected for nine-year terms. The judges are elected by the U.N. General Assembly and Security Council, based on nominations made to the Secretary-General. In order for the ICJ to hear a case, all state parties to the dispute must accept its jurisdiction. The ICJ remained marginal until the 1980s as the Soviet bloc rejected it, and Third World states soured on the idea after some early unfavorable rulings. After the ICJ ruled against the U.S. in the case brought by Nicaragua regarding the mining of Nicaraguan waters, however, it gained renewed credibility, the number of states recognizing its jurisdiction jumped dramatically, and its docket was flooded with cases.[2]
Europe has seen the most dramatic development of supranational courts. The European Court of Justice is the sole judicial organ for the European Union. It is independent in its decision-making, and its purpose is to ensure that European law is followed. The court's independence is enhanced by the fact that only one judgment of the court is released, not individual positions. The Court is generally regarded as one of the most "European-minded" institutions in the E.U., in other words acting on the principles articulated for the E.U., rather than on state interests.[3] The European Court of Human Rights has been the most active of any international human rights court, with individuals utilizing it more to assert rights than in the resolution of interstate disputes.
The Americas have also developed a significant regional court system. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights was established in the 1970s and has acted primarily as an advisory body; it has never heard a case. At times, it has been criticized as a tool for the United States to wield influence over its neighbors. However, it has also proven to be an important moral voice in the region, particularly as Latin American states have struggled with political transitions.
States have long relied on treaties and other international agreements for security against war. The first important move beyond laws of war was the Kellogg-Briand Pact, signed by 63 countries in 1928, which condemned "recourse to war for the solution of international controversies" and foreswore war as an instrument of policy. However, the conflicts of the 1930s made this agreement moot.
Many of the core principles of international law related to conflict prevention have been incorporated into the U.N. Charter. They are:
These principles often prove to be in tension with one another, however. This confusion was exacerbated by subsequent treaties, such as the 1948 convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. In practice, the protection of human rights has placed limitations on respecting state sovereignty, and force has been deemed the only effective means to protect human rights on a number of occasions.
One of the clearest appeals to international law emerged with respect to Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait. The Iraqi invasion was a clear violation of Kuwaiti sovereignty, and the ensuing Gulf War was a multilateral effort to enforce international law. The growing role of international law can be seen in the creation of the "no-fly zones" in Iraq via U.N. Security Council Resolution 688 of April 1991, which served as the legal precedent for a range of initiatives later in the decade, from Somalia to East Timor.
Initially, these actions were rationalized by arguing that internal conflict had effects that spilled across borders, but human rights discourse increasingly replaced this argument.[4] These principles of state sovereignty and human rights came into clear conflict in the war in the Balkans. Yugoslavia responded in part to Western threats by making appeals to international law. Yugoslavia sued the NATO countries in the International Court of Justice for aggression and genocide. The Court rejected the argument, but the legality of the Kosovo bombing remains uncertain.[5]
The question of terrorism has also become a difficult one for states to deal with using international law, particularly as targets become increasingly international. Some steps have been taken to address these issues. A number of conventions have been created to deal with issues ranging from aircraft hijacking to hostage-taking and abductions, but all suffer from lack of enforcement. Part of the difficulty in dealing with terrorism is a general lack of consensus over what groups and tactics would fall under such law. The law, however, still largely reflects an overly state-centric view that makes it difficult to deal with the growth of transnational groups. Taking action against groups often requires infringing on sovereignty, another core principle of international law.
One of the most dramatic developments in international law has been the growth of laws focusing on the individual, which provide protection and require accountability. Whereas in the past, international law focused primarily on regulating state behavior and defining states rights, it has increasingly been involved in identifying individual rights and holding individuals accountable. This trend began after WWII. The identification of individual responsibility in the Nuremberg Trials after World War II was followed by the creation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations. The Declaration passed largely because the Communist Bloc was abstaining at the time. In the years that have followed, there has been a proliferation of international covenants that have specified additional rights. The Yugoslav and Rwandan war crimes tribunals established by the U.N. in the 1990s, the International Criminal Court (ICC), and international covenants specifying additional rights, represent further developments.
Of the two war crimes tribunals, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) has received the most attention. The ICTY initially suffered because it pursued only low-level criminals, assuming that peace negotiations required the participation of high-level leaders. Yet in mid-1995 Prosecutor Richard Goldstone indicted Bosnian Serb leaders Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic. The peace talks continued, and the former leaders became increasingly marginalized,[6] although they remain at large. States have often been reluctant to aggressively go after war criminals if their soldiers would be placed in harm's way.[7] The ICTY became more aggressive when it indicted Slobodan Milosevic, a sitting head of state, in May 1999 for crimes against humanity.
The International Criminal Court (ICC)
The events of the 1990s, and the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the ICTY, did much to draw renewed attention to the idea of a global criminal court. The forerunner of the ICC was modeled on programs such as the United Nations War Crimes Commission, which was established by the Allies in 1943. In the post-war years, the idea of a permanent court was much talked about, but was overshadowed by the Cold War and reemerged only in 1989 initially as a means to deal with the international drug trade. Both the ICTY and ICTR (International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda) pointed to the need for a permanent body that would be a stronger deterrent and also could be more efficient, since the cost of a standing body could be less than the start-up costs of ad hoc bodies.
In late 1995, the U.N. General Assembly created the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court (PrepCom), which held a series of sessions over the next three years. Intense diplomatic activity ensued, culminating in a June-July 1998 diplomatic conference that resulted in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Jurisdiction over genocide , crimes against humanity, war crimes, and aggression was granted the ICC, although the latter crime awaits further diplomatic clarification. The statute entered into force in 2002 after the ratification by the requisite 60 countries. In early 2003, the judges and the Prosecutor were elected. Judges must be nationals of one of the State Parties (states that signed and ratified the agreement) and possess legal expertise. The judiciary must be balanced in a number of respects, representing: the major legal systems of the world; geographic areas; gender; and expertise on specific issues. The 18 judges are elected by the Assembly of States Parties and serve a single nine-year term. The Prosecutor and Deputy Prosecutor(s) are elected by an absolute majority of the Assembly of States Parties for a single nine-year term. Procedures have also been established for the early removal of judges and prosecutors, to ensure accountability.
Bringing a case before the ICC is a relatively long process. For the ICC to act, jurisdiction must be accepted by either the state where the crime was committed, or the state from which the accused came. If ICC jurisdiction exists, investigations may be initiated in a number of ways. A state-party can bring a case. The U.N. Security Council also can, even in circumstances where the jurisdiction outlined above does not exist. In addition, the Prosecutor may also initiate the process him or herself, although the Pre-Trial Chamber must approve of any investigation initiated by the Prosecutor by finding that there is a reasonable basis to proceed and that the case falls within ICC jurisdiction.
What is more, the ICC is meant to be complementary to national courts. Therefore, the ICC will not proceed if a State is or has been investigating the crime, unless the State is seen to be unwilling or unable to proceed. The ICC Prosecutor must notify all states that it is initiating an investigation, and states are able to assert a superior right to exercise jurisdiction. The U.N. Security Council can block proceedings through a positive resolution, but this prohibition lasts for only one year. Once a case has been initiated, the Prosecutor evaluates whether to proceed with the investigation. It is the job of the Pre-Trial Chamber to determine whether to issue warrants and orders requested by the Prosecutor. If the warrant is issued, after the accused has been informed of the charges against him or her, the Pre-Trial Chamber determines whether to confirm the charges. The trial would proceed from there.
The strength of the ICC remains to be proven, particularly since the U.S. does not support the court. The U.S. is concerned that its troops on peacekeeping missions would be subject to prosecution that might be politically motivated. The U.S. would also like the Prosecutor to have less independent authority, and more control exercised by the Security Council, where the U.S. has veto power. Other countries may have similar misgivings, but may lack the international influence to take a decisive stand. They may fear the potential embarrassment of having their human rights records put on trial. Leaders who have violated the human rights of their citizens or others may fear prosecution. The U.S. case remains somewhat unique since it has the largest military in the world and tends to be involved in more places more frequently. It also reflects a concern for entangling international obligations that has been an undercurrent of U.S. foreign policy for much of its history. In essence, the U.S. is reluctant to give up the ability to act in its self-interest that its power provides.
Although much of this discussion has portrayed international law as a potential means of conflict management or resolution, it should be remembered that law is itself a source of significant conflict. The shape and content of law often favors particular groups or countries. Not only is international law often most influential when it favors the strongest, but the powerful are also typically the source of law. For example, because much of international law is formed by the U.N., the Security Council has a disproportionate influence in shaping it.
One prominent example of might makes right in international law is in the realm of laws related to trade and investment. Enforcement comes largely through power, which means that the developed world often controls the agenda. They have the market power to punish and entice smaller states to comply. The creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995 marked a dramatic advancement in the development of trade law and enforcement mechanisms over what existed under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The WTO has been widely criticized for "green room"[8] agenda-setting by the global North, and other actions that put the South at a disadvantage.[9] New laws also create significant administrative burden for poor states, which is perhaps not bad for the long run, but makes for costly compliance.[10]
At base, though, law is only as effective as the means of enforcement and developing countries lack the power to retaliate effectively. Trade law is branching out into new areas as well, which will potentially put the South at an even greater disadvantage. Efforts are in various stages to link trade law to a range of issues from intellectual property regulations (TRIPs) to the environment to labor standards. TRIPs appear to favor Northern multinational corporations, while not protecting indigenous knowledge.[11] It also promises to make the cost of drugs to fight deadly illnesses such as AIDS a severe burden for poor countries. In terms of environmental law, it is often seen by the South as cutting off the path to development that the North took long ago, leaving the South in permanent dependency.
At the same time, the WTO's Dispute Settlement Understanding does take many steps to help developing countries operate on equal footing, compared to the GATT.[12] Each case must have a representative from the South as one of the three hearing the case. Voting is more explicit than under the GATT. Provisions have also been made to provide expertise to delegations from the South, but they are still left unable to shape the agenda. In sum, the WTO Dispute Settlement System does provide better opportunity for developing countries to bring complaints, but they often lack the technical expertise to take advantage of it.
International law has also been criticized as fundamentally Western. Certainly, most international law is based on Western notions. One sign of this might be that the Western Countries are more compliant with the international laws on human rights.[13] Others argue, however, that the widespread acceptance of international law is evidence that the principles on which it is based are not strictly Western. Still, it is not clear that many developing countries are entirely free to accede to these rules, as the WTO example above suggests. Western countries are able to provide incentives for less powerful countries to accede to their wishes. Either way, however, it means that international law has at least some force behind it, though not nearly as much as domestic legal systems.
[1] William A. Schabas, "International Law and Response to Conflict," in Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict , eds. Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall (Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2001), 603-618. < http://www.amazon.com/Turbulent-Peace-Challenges-Managing-International/dp/1929223277 >.
[3] Trevor C. Hartley, The Foundations of European Community Law, Third Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994). Access revised edition (2010) here.
[4] Schabas 2001.
[5] Ibid, 607.
[7] Gary Jonathan Bass, Stay the Hand of Vengeance : The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000). < http://books.google.com/books?id=M3XeD1OvxRYC >.
[8] So called green room deals refer to pre-negotiation meetings of representatives of developed countries in which they agree to a position for negotiations involving the broader international community. Given their power and influence, they are then able to present a unified front in negotiations with developing countries and therefore shape the debate such to favor their interests.
[9] Sarah Anderson, ed., Views from the South: The Effects of Globalization and the WTO on Third World Countries (Chicago: Food First Books, 2000) < http://books.google.com/books?id=fai2AAAAIAAJ >.; Walden Bello, "Reforming the WTO is the Wrong Agenda," in Globalize This!: The Battle Against the World Trade Organization and Corporate Rule, eds. Kevin Danaher and Roger Burback (Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press, 2000) 103-119. < http://books.google.com/books?id=3lRjQgAACAAJ >.
[10] Magda Shahin, From Marrakesh to Singapore: The WTO and Developing Countries. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network. < http://books.google.com/books?id=CdC2AAAAIAAJ >.
[11]Anderson 2000.
[12] Kofi Oteng Kufuor, "From the GATT to the WTO -- The Developing Countries and the Reform of the Procedures for the Settlement of International Trade Disputes," Journal of World Trade 31, no. 5 (October 1997): 117-147.
[13] Louis Henkin, The Age of Rights (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990). < http://books.google.com/books?id=jxYCBOV1IwwC >.
Use the following to cite this article: Brahm, Eric. "International Law." Beyond Intractability . Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted: September 2003 < http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/international-law >.
The intractable conflict challenge.
Our inability to constructively handle intractable conflict is the most serious, and the most neglected, problem facing humanity. Solving today's tough problems depends upon finding better ways of dealing with these conflicts. More...
Get the Newsletter Check Out Our Quick Start Guide
Educators Consider a low-cost BI-based custom text .
Constructive Conflict Initiative
Join Us in calling for a dramatic expansion of efforts to limit the destructiveness of intractable conflict.
Practical things we can all do to limit the destructive conflicts threatening our future.
A free, open, online seminar exploring new approaches for addressing difficult and intractable conflicts. Major topic areas include:
Scale, Complexity, & Intractability
Massively Parallel Peacebuilding
Authoritarian Populism
Constructive Confrontation
An look at to the fundamental building blocks of the peace and conflict field covering both “tractable” and intractable conflict.
Beyond Intractability / CRInfo Knowledge Base
Home / Browse | Essays | Search | About
Links to thought-provoking articles exploring the larger, societal dimension of intractability.
Information about interesting conflict and peacebuilding efforts.
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Beyond Intractability or the Conflict Information Consortium.
Beyond Intractability
Unless otherwise noted on individual pages, all content is... Copyright © 2003-2022 The Beyond Intractability Project c/o the Conflict Information Consortium All rights reserved. Content may not be reproduced without prior written permission.
Guidelines for Using Beyond Intractability resources.
Citing Beyond Intractability resources.
Photo Credits for Homepage, Sidebars, and Landing Pages
Contact Beyond Intractability Privacy Policy The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess , Co-Directors and Editors c/o Conflict Information Consortium Mailing Address: Beyond Intractability, #1188, 1601 29th St. Suite 1292, Boulder CO 80301, USA Contact Form
Powered by Drupal
production_1
Author Webpage
This book contains original essays by eighteen of the world's leading scholars and practitioners of international relations and international law. Together they address the highly topical question of the role that international law plays in international politics at the turn of the century. Both theoretical and political in its scope, it examines the character of international rules and norms, the way in which they develop, and how they affect political decision-making in a variety of contexts including international peace and security, international economic relations, international human rights, international development, and the environment.
Sign in with a library card.
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Click the account icon in the top right to:
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.
Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 13 |
October 2022 | 17 |
October 2022 | 8 |
October 2022 | 10 |
October 2022 | 1 |
October 2022 | 18 |
October 2022 | 1 |
October 2022 | 12 |
October 2022 | 2 |
October 2022 | 26 |
October 2022 | 20 |
October 2022 | 18 |
October 2022 | 25 |
October 2022 | 29 |
October 2022 | 160 |
October 2022 | 8 |
October 2022 | 20 |
October 2022 | 28 |
October 2022 | 14 |
October 2022 | 31 |
November 2022 | 4 |
November 2022 | 3 |
November 2022 | 13 |
November 2022 | 11 |
November 2022 | 3 |
November 2022 | 15 |
November 2022 | 11 |
November 2022 | 7 |
November 2022 | 2 |
November 2022 | 10 |
November 2022 | 26 |
November 2022 | 22 |
November 2022 | 155 |
November 2022 | 33 |
November 2022 | 2 |
November 2022 | 14 |
November 2022 | 11 |
November 2022 | 9 |
November 2022 | 16 |
November 2022 | 10 |
December 2022 | 10 |
December 2022 | 1 |
December 2022 | 6 |
December 2022 | 6 |
December 2022 | 10 |
December 2022 | 16 |
December 2022 | 6 |
December 2022 | 2 |
December 2022 | 8 |
December 2022 | 15 |
December 2022 | 55 |
December 2022 | 21 |
December 2022 | 12 |
December 2022 | 18 |
December 2022 | 5 |
December 2022 | 21 |
December 2022 | 6 |
December 2022 | 12 |
December 2022 | 2 |
January 2023 | 8 |
January 2023 | 20 |
January 2023 | 6 |
January 2023 | 5 |
January 2023 | 5 |
January 2023 | 3 |
January 2023 | 17 |
January 2023 | 2 |
January 2023 | 15 |
January 2023 | 14 |
January 2023 | 12 |
January 2023 | 57 |
January 2023 | 7 |
January 2023 | 9 |
January 2023 | 6 |
January 2023 | 12 |
January 2023 | 1 |
February 2023 | 2 |
February 2023 | 15 |
February 2023 | 30 |
February 2023 | 5 |
February 2023 | 15 |
February 2023 | 3 |
February 2023 | 9 |
February 2023 | 8 |
February 2023 | 8 |
February 2023 | 5 |
February 2023 | 12 |
February 2023 | 1 |
February 2023 | 3 |
February 2023 | 30 |
February 2023 | 7 |
February 2023 | 10 |
February 2023 | 2 |
February 2023 | 8 |
February 2023 | 8 |
February 2023 | 2 |
February 2023 | 6 |
February 2023 | 1 |
March 2023 | 13 |
March 2023 | 7 |
March 2023 | 8 |
March 2023 | 6 |
March 2023 | 10 |
March 2023 | 26 |
March 2023 | 3 |
March 2023 | 6 |
March 2023 | 5 |
March 2023 | 6 |
March 2023 | 9 |
March 2023 | 4 |
March 2023 | 2 |
March 2023 | 24 |
March 2023 | 13 |
March 2023 | 7 |
March 2023 | 8 |
March 2023 | 37 |
April 2023 | 20 |
April 2023 | 16 |
April 2023 | 6 |
April 2023 | 1 |
April 2023 | 10 |
April 2023 | 3 |
April 2023 | 5 |
April 2023 | 4 |
April 2023 | 5 |
April 2023 | 4 |
April 2023 | 49 |
April 2023 | 15 |
April 2023 | 4 |
April 2023 | 16 |
April 2023 | 2 |
April 2023 | 1 |
April 2023 | 4 |
May 2023 | 3 |
May 2023 | 7 |
May 2023 | 23 |
May 2023 | 4 |
May 2023 | 11 |
May 2023 | 4 |
May 2023 | 11 |
May 2023 | 11 |
May 2023 | 3 |
May 2023 | 5 |
May 2023 | 8 |
May 2023 | 59 |
May 2023 | 10 |
May 2023 | 15 |
May 2023 | 8 |
May 2023 | 22 |
May 2023 | 9 |
June 2023 | 3 |
June 2023 | 7 |
June 2023 | 5 |
June 2023 | 2 |
June 2023 | 9 |
June 2023 | 2 |
June 2023 | 9 |
June 2023 | 13 |
June 2023 | 8 |
June 2023 | 1 |
June 2023 | 5 |
June 2023 | 27 |
June 2023 | 8 |
June 2023 | 7 |
June 2023 | 2 |
June 2023 | 11 |
June 2023 | 1 |
June 2023 | 2 |
June 2023 | 1 |
June 2023 | 2 |
June 2023 | 2 |
July 2023 | 2 |
July 2023 | 10 |
July 2023 | 4 |
July 2023 | 6 |
July 2023 | 6 |
July 2023 | 3 |
July 2023 | 5 |
July 2023 | 8 |
July 2023 | 2 |
July 2023 | 5 |
July 2023 | 2 |
July 2023 | 3 |
July 2023 | 24 |
July 2023 | 6 |
July 2023 | 10 |
July 2023 | 1 |
July 2023 | 2 |
July 2023 | 6 |
July 2023 | 3 |
August 2023 | 14 |
August 2023 | 3 |
August 2023 | 12 |
August 2023 | 3 |
August 2023 | 13 |
August 2023 | 3 |
August 2023 | 8 |
August 2023 | 9 |
August 2023 | 5 |
August 2023 | 1 |
August 2023 | 5 |
August 2023 | 2 |
August 2023 | 6 |
August 2023 | 19 |
August 2023 | 3 |
August 2023 | 7 |
August 2023 | 13 |
August 2023 | 1 |
August 2023 | 3 |
August 2023 | 5 |
August 2023 | 12 |
August 2023 | 2 |
September 2023 | 18 |
September 2023 | 4 |
September 2023 | 7 |
September 2023 | 5 |
September 2023 | 14 |
September 2023 | 6 |
September 2023 | 2 |
September 2023 | 13 |
September 2023 | 11 |
September 2023 | 4 |
September 2023 | 81 |
September 2023 | 18 |
September 2023 | 10 |
September 2023 | 3 |
September 2023 | 12 |
September 2023 | 2 |
September 2023 | 11 |
September 2023 | 2 |
September 2023 | 2 |
September 2023 | 7 |
September 2023 | 3 |
October 2023 | 36 |
October 2023 | 23 |
October 2023 | 1 |
October 2023 | 7 |
October 2023 | 17 |
October 2023 | 6 |
October 2023 | 22 |
October 2023 | 8 |
October 2023 | 26 |
October 2023 | 10 |
October 2023 | 178 |
October 2023 | 8 |
October 2023 | 17 |
October 2023 | 17 |
October 2023 | 10 |
October 2023 | 21 |
October 2023 | 18 |
October 2023 | 8 |
November 2023 | 1 |
November 2023 | 18 |
November 2023 | 5 |
November 2023 | 9 |
November 2023 | 2 |
November 2023 | 2 |
November 2023 | 11 |
November 2023 | 1 |
November 2023 | 13 |
November 2023 | 3 |
November 2023 | 2 |
November 2023 | 8 |
November 2023 | 109 |
November 2023 | 1 |
November 2023 | 13 |
November 2023 | 10 |
November 2023 | 1 |
November 2023 | 6 |
November 2023 | 7 |
December 2023 | 11 |
December 2023 | 2 |
December 2023 | 8 |
December 2023 | 2 |
December 2023 | 9 |
December 2023 | 3 |
December 2023 | 39 |
December 2023 | 4 |
December 2023 | 7 |
December 2023 | 3 |
December 2023 | 2 |
December 2023 | 3 |
December 2023 | 10 |
December 2023 | 10 |
December 2023 | 1 |
December 2023 | 9 |
January 2024 | 18 |
January 2024 | 2 |
January 2024 | 23 |
January 2024 | 6 |
January 2024 | 19 |
January 2024 | 28 |
January 2024 | 4 |
January 2024 | 15 |
January 2024 | 13 |
January 2024 | 68 |
January 2024 | 16 |
January 2024 | 4 |
January 2024 | 22 |
January 2024 | 12 |
January 2024 | 14 |
January 2024 | 8 |
January 2024 | 17 |
January 2024 | 1 |
January 2024 | 21 |
February 2024 | 3 |
February 2024 | 6 |
February 2024 | 27 |
February 2024 | 9 |
February 2024 | 2 |
February 2024 | 4 |
February 2024 | 4 |
February 2024 | 3 |
February 2024 | 6 |
February 2024 | 1 |
February 2024 | 5 |
February 2024 | 7 |
February 2024 | 62 |
February 2024 | 13 |
February 2024 | 8 |
February 2024 | 21 |
February 2024 | 2 |
March 2024 | 17 |
March 2024 | 5 |
March 2024 | 12 |
March 2024 | 15 |
March 2024 | 2 |
March 2024 | 17 |
March 2024 | 4 |
March 2024 | 5 |
March 2024 | 10 |
March 2024 | 4 |
March 2024 | 11 |
March 2024 | 2 |
March 2024 | 1 |
March 2024 | 6 |
March 2024 | 2 |
March 2024 | 8 |
March 2024 | 17 |
March 2024 | 30 |
March 2024 | 2 |
March 2024 | 5 |
March 2024 | 12 |
March 2024 | 2 |
April 2024 | 35 |
April 2024 | 4 |
April 2024 | 9 |
April 2024 | 14 |
April 2024 | 3 |
April 2024 | 2 |
April 2024 | 13 |
April 2024 | 1 |
April 2024 | 1 |
April 2024 | 5 |
April 2024 | 2 |
April 2024 | 3 |
April 2024 | 16 |
April 2024 | 36 |
April 2024 | 7 |
April 2024 | 2 |
April 2024 | 6 |
May 2024 | 1 |
May 2024 | 17 |
May 2024 | 13 |
May 2024 | 5 |
May 2024 | 8 |
May 2024 | 4 |
May 2024 | 7 |
May 2024 | 5 |
May 2024 | 8 |
May 2024 | 3 |
May 2024 | 2 |
May 2024 | 46 |
May 2024 | 11 |
May 2024 | 7 |
May 2024 | 17 |
May 2024 | 14 |
May 2024 | 11 |
June 2024 | 7 |
June 2024 | 5 |
June 2024 | 9 |
June 2024 | 5 |
June 2024 | 3 |
June 2024 | 3 |
June 2024 | 1 |
June 2024 | 9 |
June 2024 | 2 |
June 2024 | 2 |
June 2024 | 1 |
June 2024 | 4 |
June 2024 | 24 |
June 2024 | 2 |
June 2024 | 1 |
June 2024 | 1 |
June 2024 | 6 |
June 2024 | 11 |
June 2024 | 1 |
June 2024 | 1 |
June 2024 | 1 |
July 2024 | 2 |
July 2024 | 13 |
July 2024 | 4 |
July 2024 | 5 |
July 2024 | 10 |
July 2024 | 6 |
July 2024 | 6 |
July 2024 | 9 |
July 2024 | 1 |
July 2024 | 3 |
July 2024 | 3 |
July 2024 | 6 |
July 2024 | 41 |
July 2024 | 9 |
July 2024 | 5 |
July 2024 | 1 |
July 2024 | 2 |
July 2024 | 6 |
July 2024 | 4 |
July 2024 | 4 |
July 2024 | 3 |
July 2024 | 7 |
August 2024 | 6 |
August 2024 | 10 |
August 2024 | 6 |
August 2024 | 5 |
August 2024 | 8 |
August 2024 | 5 |
August 2024 | 6 |
August 2024 | 3 |
August 2024 | 3 |
August 2024 | 5 |
August 2024 | 4 |
August 2024 | 19 |
August 2024 | 3 |
August 2024 | 5 |
August 2024 | 3 |
August 2024 | 3 |
August 2024 | 12 |
August 2024 | 1 |
August 2024 | 1 |
August 2024 | 2 |
August 2024 | 7 |
September 2024 | 2 |
September 2024 | 1 |
September 2024 | 2 |
September 2024 | 2 |
September 2024 | 4 |
September 2024 | 4 |
September 2024 | 6 |
September 2024 | 1 |
September 2024 | 4 |
September 2024 | 96 |
September 2024 | 4 |
September 2024 | 5 |
September 2024 | 7 |
September 2024 | 1 |
September 2024 | 5 |
September 2024 | 5 |
September 2024 | 2 |
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide
Sign In or Create an Account
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
Brill | Nijhoff
Brill | Wageningen Academic
Brill Germany / Austria
Böhlau
Brill | Fink
Brill | mentis
Brill | Schöningh
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
V&R unipress
Open Access
Open Access for Authors
Transformative Agreements
Open Access and Research Funding
Open Access for Librarians
Open Access for Academic Societies
Discover Brill’s Open Access Content
Organization
Stay updated
Corporate Social Responsiblity
Investor Relations
Policies, rights & permissions
Review a Brill Book
Author Portal
How to publish with Brill: Files & Guides
Fonts, Scripts and Unicode
Publication Ethics & COPE Compliance
Data Sharing Policy
Brill MyBook
Ordering from Brill
Author Newsletter
Piracy Reporting Form
Sales Managers and Sales Contacts
Ordering From Brill
Titles No Longer Published by Brill
Catalogs, Flyers and Price Lists
E-Book Collections Title Lists and MARC Records
How to Manage your Online Holdings
LibLynx Access Management
Discovery Services
KBART Files
MARC Records
Online User and Order Help
Rights and Permissions
Latest Key Figures
Latest Financial Press Releases and Reports
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
Share Information
Specialty Products
Press and Reviews
Prices from (excl. shipping):
1. acccepting the hague prize 18 june 2004, international litigation and courts, the law of treaties, the law of the sea, international responsibility, miscellaneous, biographical note, share link with colleague or librarian, product details.
Reference Works
Primary source collections
COVID-19 Collection
How to publish with Brill
Open Access Content
Contact & Info
Sales contacts
Publishing contacts
Stay Updated
Newsletters
Social Media Overview
Terms and Conditions
Privacy Statement
Cookie Settings
Accessibility
Legal Notice
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement | Cookie Settings | Accessibility | Legal Notice | Copyright © 2016-2024
Copyright © 2016-2024
Character limit 500 /500
Among the greatest achievements of the United Nations is the development of a body of international law, which is central to promoting economic and social development, as well as to advancing international peace and security. The international law is enshrined in conventions, treaties and standards. Many of the treaties brought about by the United Nations form the basis of the law that governs relations among nations. While the work of the UN in this area does not always receive attention, it has a daily impact on the lives of people everywhere.
The Charter of the United Nations specifically calls on the Organization to help in the settlement of international disputes by peaceful means, including arbitration and judicial settlement ( Article 33 ), and to encourage the progressive development of international law and its codification ( Article 13 ).
Over the years, more than 560 multilateral treaties have been deposited with the UN Secretary-General . Many other treaties are deposited with governments or other entities. The treaties cover a broad range of subject matters such as human rights, disarmament and protection of the environment.
The General Assembly is composed of representatives from each UN Member State and is the main deliberative body on matters relating to international law. Many multilateral treaties are in fact adopted by the General Assembly and subsequently opened for signature and ratification. The Legal (Sixth) Committee assists the work of the General Assembly by providing advice on substantive legal matters. The Committee is also made up of representatives from all UN Member States.
The General Assembly has adopted several multilateral treaties throughout its history, including:
In many areas, the legal work of the United Nations has been pioneering, addressing problems as they take on an international dimension. The UN has been at the forefront of efforts to provide a legal framework in such areas as protecting the environment, regulating migrant labour, curbing drug trafficking and combating terrorism. This work continues today, as international law assumes a more central role across a wider spectrum of issues, including human rights law and international humanitarian law.
To encourage Member States to sign conventions or deposit binding instruments concerning these treaties, the United Nations hosts annual , as well as special Treaty Events. The Treaty Event of 2023 focused on promoting universal participation in multilateral environmental agreements for a healthier planet.
International law commission.
The International Law Commission was established by the General Assembly in 1947 to promote the progressive development of international law and its codification. The Commission is composed of 34 members who collectively represent the world's principal legal systems, and serve as experts in their individual capacity, not as representatives of their governments. They address issues relevant to the regulation of relations among states, and frequently consult with the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and UN specialized agencies, depending on the subject. Often, the Commission also prepares drafts on aspects of international law.
Some topics are chosen by the Commission, others are referred to it by the General Assembly. When the Commission completes work on a topic, the General Assembly sometimes convenes an international conference of plenipotentiaries to incorporate the draft into a convention. The convention is then opened to states to become parties — meaning that such countries formally agree to be bound by its provisions. Some of these conventions form the very foundation of the law governing relations among states. Examples include:
International humanitarian law encompasses the principles and rules that regulate the means and methods of warfare, as well as the humanitarian protection of civilian populations, sick and wounded combatants, and prisoners of war. Major instruments include the 1949 Geneva Convention for the Protection of War Victims and two additional protocols concluded in 1977 under the auspices of the International Committee of the Red Cross.
The United Nations has taken a leading role in efforts to advance international humanitarian law. The Security Council has become increasingly involved in protecting civilians in armed conflict, promoting human rights and protecting children in wars .
The primary United Nations organ for the settlement of disputes is the International Court of Justice . Also known as the World Court, it was founded in 1946. Since its founding, the Court has considered over 190 cases , issued numerous judgments and issued advisory opinions in response to requests by UN organizations. Most cases have been dealt with by the full Court, but some have been referred to special chambers at the request of the parties.
In its judgments, the Court has addressed international disputes involving economic rights, rights of passage, the non-use of force, non-interference in the internal affairs of states, diplomatic relations, hostage-taking, the right of asylum and nationality. States bring such disputes before the Court in search of an impartial solution to their differences based on law. By achieving peaceful settlement on such questions as land frontiers, maritime boundaries and territorial sovereignty, the Court has often helped to prevent the escalation of disputes.
The international community had long aspired to create a permanent international court to try the most serious international crimes, and, in the 20th century, it reached consensus on definitions of genocide , crimes against humanity and war crimes.
After the Second World War, the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials addressed war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity committed during the Second World War.
The ad hoc tribunals and UN-assisted tribunals have contributed to combating impunity and promoting accountability for the most serious crimes. In the 1990s, after the end of the Cold War, the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) (1993-2017) and for Rwanda (ICTR) (1994-2015) were established to try crimes committed within a specific time-frame and during a specific conflict. This applies, as well, to three courts established by the states concerned, but with substantial UN support: the Special Court for Sierra Leone (2002-2013), the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (2006-2022) and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (2007-2023). They are non-permanent institutions, which cease to exist once all their cases are heard. Except for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, which completed its work on 31 December 2023, the rest are now in residual mode – carrying out essential functions after the completion of their mandates. The residual functions for the ICTY and ICTR are carried out by the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals .
The idea of a permanent international court to prosecute crimes against humanity was first considered at the United Nations in the context of the adoption of the Genocide Convention of 1948. For many years, differences of opinions forestalled further developments. In 1992, the General Assembly directed the International Law Commission to prepare a draft statute for such a court. The massacres in Cambodia, the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda made the need for it even more urgent.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has jurisdiction to prosecute individuals who commit genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. It will also have jurisdiction over the crime of aggression when an agreement is reached on the definition of such a crime. The ICC is legally and functionally independent from the United Nations, and is not a part of the UN system.
The cooperation between the UN and the ICC is governed by a Negotiated Relationship Agreement. The Security Council can initiate proceedings before the ICC, and can refer to the ICC situations that would not otherwise fall under the Court’s jurisdiction. The Court has 18 judges, elected by the states parties for a term limited to nine years, except that a judge shall remain in office to complete any trial or appeal which has already begun. No two judges can be from the same country.
Read more about international law and justice.
Please note: we are aware of some payment processing issues with USA based orders, we are currently working to resolve this - sorry for any inconvenience caused!
"[Post Qualitative Inquiry in Academia: Animating Potential for Intensities and Becoming in Writing] is original, provocative, moving, surprising, enlightening; a pleasure and a privilege to read."
- Professor Jonathan Wyatt, University of Edinburgh
This book contains ten writings on different aspects of international law, each of them cross-referenced, in instances in which information in one is relevant to points made in another. The first essay considers the character of the subject, and its relation to other entities of relevance to it, such as its compatibility with national law and its relation to maritime law. The second one considers different types of legal instruments in settings of international law, and explains how to read a multilateral convention, using the Convention for the International Sale of Goods as an example. The third part discusses the characteristics of a state and the concept of recognition, the fourth reviews the various roles that institutions take in international law, concentrating in particular on major regional organisations, and the fifth explores the extent to which the World Trade Organisation and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade provide for developing countries.
Essay Six summarises the framework for international labour law and investigates its contents and workings, then the seventh considers which countries predominate in the running of international institutions. The eighth paper explores how regional entities might co-operate with international institutions in the harmonisation of the law, and the ninth one investigates the place of negotiation as a method of international dispute resolution. Finally, the tenth essay considers the past, present and future of international law, and reviews especially the role of language.
Graeme Baber is an independent legal researcher, specializing in international, European and United Kingdom financial law. He has published more than 30 articles, comments, briefings and updates across these areas, and his previous books with Cambridge Scholars Publishing include The Impact of Legislation and Regulation on the Freedom of Movement of Capital in Estonia, Poland and Latvia and The Free Movement of Capital and Financial Services: An Exposition? His most recent book is a treatise entitled The European Union and the Global Financial Crisis: A View from 2016 (Nova Science Publishers). Graeme is an experienced teacher of university students, lecturing on both financial law and international law.
There are currently no reviews for this title. Please do revisit this page again to see if some have been added.
Buy This Book
ISBN: 1-4438-4378-4
ISBN13: 978-1-4438-4378-2
Release Date: 23rd December 2016
Price: £74.99
New and Forthcoming
Cambridge Scholars Publishing | Registration Number: 04333775
Please note that Cambridge Scholars Publishing Limited is not affiliated to or associated with Cambridge University Press or the University of Cambridge
Copyright © 2024 Cambridge Scholars Publishing. All rights reserved.
Designed and Built by Prime Creative
Please fill in the short form below for any enquiries.
Please enter your email address below;
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
COMMENTS
es of international law.7. The latter are the rights and freedom. contained within the UDHR.Thus, there are arguments for the UDHR to be both customary international law and principles of international law - which should ensure its standing in relation to the Me. bers of the United Nations.Who may rely on prov.
11 International Law Essay Topics To be able to write an exceptional international law essay, you need an excellent paper idea. Here you will get some amazing topics! You can use these international law essay ideas for composing your paper or read them for inspiration. Use the following ideas to practice or complete your assignment:
The Harvard International Law Journal publishes scholarship on international law from authors around the world and hosts annual symposia on timely topics. Explore the latest articles, features, and events on topics such as Bretton Woods 3.0, trade policing, cyber espionage, and more.
Browse free essays on various topics of international law written by students. Find examples of dissertations, proposals, literature reviews and more on international law issues.
International law is the body of legal rules, norms, and standards that apply between sovereign states and other entities that are legally recognized as international actors. It differs from national laws in several respects, such as the absence of a comprehensive legislature, courts, police, or executive authority, and the reliance on reciprocity and self-interest for compliance.
Learn the definition, sources, and categories of public international law, the body of rules and principles that regulate state-to-state relations. Explore the role of treaties, custom, and general principles in international law, as well as the role of the UN Charter and international dispute resolution.
A chapter from a book on international law and international relations that argues that international law is an integral part of the international society and its effectiveness and adaptability are essential for a stable order. It also explains that international law is not the only factor and needs to be respected within a framework of the rule of law.
The historical divide between power and international law is breaking down in a modern international system that is at once anarchical, competitive and highly legalized. While IR scholars have often considered international law to be relatively unimportant, separate from politics, and/or a means of fostering cooperation and mitigating conflict, recent scholarship at the intersection of power ...
This Essay argues that none of the bills are satisfactory because they would either violate international law or fail to deliver meaningful compensation to Ukraine. Instead, the Essay urges policymakers to use economic sanctions as leverage to compel Russia to make reparations through an international claims-settlement process.
The paper seeks to throw light on the concept of state responsibility under public international law. It deals with the elements of state responsibility, the elements of international responsibility and the relationship between the state and individual responsibility under international law. It also explains the distinction between the commission and the failure to prevent or punish.
Philosophy of International Law. First published Thu May 12, 2022. The English phrase "international law" was first coined by the utilitarian philosopher, Jeremy Bentham (Janis 1984). But philosophical engagement with international legal themes stretches back to writings on natural law in ancient Greece and Rome.
International Humanitarian Law Concepts and Challenges. IHL is often termed as the law of war, the laws and customs of war or the law of armed conflict, is a legal framework valid to situations of armed conflict, (armed conflicts may be international or non-international in character). It is comprised of the Geneva Conventions and the Hague ...
By Eric Brahm September 2003 International law has emerged from an effort to deal with conflict among states, since rules provide order and help to mitigate destructive conflict. It is developed in a number of ways. First, law often comes out of international agreements and treaties between states. Treaties are the most important source of international law and also serve as the origins of ...
This book contains original essays by eighteen of the world's leading scholars and practitioners of international relations and international law. Together they address the highly topical question of the role that international law plays in international politics at the turn of the century.
law and the state.7 These are neither necessarily alternative nor exhaustive views of law, but rather reflect significant and often overlapping features of law and legality. International law well-illustrates this more nuanced understanding of law. This article will consider humanitarian interventions conducted
Essays on International Law and Practice. Author: Shabtai Rosenne. This volume collects papers written by Shabtai Rosenne in the course of his distinguished career on various topics, primarily in the areas in which he is best known for his expertise: international litigation and courts, the law of treaties, the law of the sea and state ...
Learn how the UN promotes and develops international law and justice through conventions, treaties, standards and judicial settlement. Explore the topics and issues covered by the UN, such as ...
A book of ten essays on various aspects of international law, such as its character, sources, institutions, trade, labour, regional co-operation and dispute resolution. Each essay is cross-referenced with other essays and provides examples and references.
Sample Undergraduate 1st International Law Essay. Author: Barclay Littlewood , Modified: 16 July 2023. This sample International Law essay was written by one of our expert writers, to give you a taste of the work we produce. You can also check out the plagiarism report delivered free with every essay!
This paper is a brief review essay of Anne Orford's book 'International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect' which, along with three others and a response by the author published in the inaugural issue of the 'London Review of International Law', was first given at an author-meets-reader session at the University of Sydney.
International Law the Concept of. Anyone who has ever seen a car with a diplomatic license plate parked illegally will seethe and curse diplomatic immunity as a concept. However, without diplomatic immunity, U.S. diplomats would be subject to the laws of Islamic states, or states whose values and principles they found abhorrent.
GENEVA (18 September 2024) - Over 50 days since the International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered its historic Advisory Opinion, declaring that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory unlawful, UN experts* are warning that the edifice of international law stands upon a knife's edge, with most States failing to take meaningful steps to comply with their international obligations ...
Martha L. Schweitz, J.D., has been Professor International Law at Seinan Gakuin University, Fukuoka, Japan, since 1990, after teaching in Japan as a Fulbright lecturer the year before. Previously, she taught international law at the University of Oregon (1986-89) and practiced international business law with a Chicago firm (1981-86).